The New York Times' Public Enemy #1: Sarah Palin
While ABC, NBC, CBS and virtually every blog that pays homage to His Holiness, The Obama, has spent tireless hours chopping at the image of Sarah Palin, it is not surprising that The New York Times has delivered the sharpest hacks. The "Newspaper" that hasn't endorsed a Republican presidential candidate since Eisenhower has pulled out all the stops in whacking away at the woman from Alaska with its liberal hatchet of hate.
We've seen them attack the pregnancy of Palin's unwed daughter, running stories hinting at hypocrisy. All this from a paper that holds Hollywood as a moral compass.
Oh, but that isn't enough for The Times. They have also run articles questioning Palin's dedication as a mother, evidently because she has such a powerfully successful career. Of course, Michelle Obama's career as a lawyer, community organizer and hospital executive is the stuff of maternal legend.
The Times also reported that <gasp> Todd Palin (Sarah's husband) was arrested 22 years ago for drunk driving. Let's see, that would have been around the same time that Barack Obama was "experimenting" with cocaine. I guess it's six in one, half-dozen in the other.
According to The New York Times, Sarah Palin has her own share of questionable associations, including lobbyists who brought money to Alaska. She hasn't spent twenty years under a hate-mongering paster, befriended an unrepentant terrorist, and worked real estate deals with a convicted felon . . . but, come on, these people brought money to Alaska!
And do I even need to mention their "She doesn't have the experience" mantra? Of course, she is the #2 on the ticket and compares favorably to the #1 on the Democratic ticket when it comes to experience so what is the difference? The difference is that Sarah Palin doesn't have testicles.
