Digging Deeper Into Obama's Cairo Speech

The interesting thing about Barack Obama's self-indulgent, teleprompted speeches is that the more you dig into them the more they reveal his extremist ideology. Whether it's socialist nationalization within the public sector, radical partial birth and post birth abortion stances or an economic policy that makes Mike Tyson seem thrifty, the Chosen One's bizarre world view is hard to miss for anyone who cares to take look closely.

I found another example today as I read an article by Christopher Hitchens that made an observation about Obama's Cairo speech that I had completely missed . . . and as is often the case when you dig into the mind of Barack Obama, it's more frightening than Freddy Krueger at a narcoleptic slumber party.

From When the Extreme Becomes the Norm

Take the single case in which our president touched upon the best-known fact about the Islamic "world": its tendency to make women second-class citizens. He mentioned this only to say that "Western countries" were discriminating against Muslim women! And how is this discrimination imposed? By limiting the wearing of the head scarf or hijab (a word that Obama pronounced as hajib—imagine the uproar if George Bush had done that). The clear implication was an attack on the French law that prohibits the display of religious garb or symbols in state schools. Indeed, the following day in Paris, Obama made this point even more explicitly. I quote from an excellent commentary by an Algerian-American visiting professor at the University of Michigan Law School, Karima Bennoune, who says:

"I have just published research conducted among the many people of Muslim, Arab and North African descent in France who support that country's 2004 law banning religious symbols in public schools which they see as a necessary deployment of the "law of the republic" to counter the "law of the Brothers," an informal rule imposed undemocratically on many women and girls in neighborhoods and at home and by fundamentalists."

But to the women who are compelled to dress according to the requirements of others, Obama had nothing to say at all, as if the only "right" at stake were the right to obey an instruction that is, in fact—if it matters—not found in the Quran. In Turkey, too, head scarves for women are outlawed in some contexts. Is this, too, Islamophobia? Does the president think that the veil and the burqa are also freely chosen fashion statements? This sort of naiveté is worrying, and it means that among the global Muslim audience, the wrong sort of people were laughing at us, while the ones who ought to be our friends and allies were shedding a disappointed tear.

Obama's Cairo Speech: What He Said and What He Didn't

I didn't see Obama's Cairo speech, so I missed the teleprompted grins and gambols, but I did get a chance to read the text posted by the LA Times. What I found was a mixed bag.

The President knows Americans are starting to lose confidence in his decision making. While his popularity remains high, polls consistently show that Americans do not like his policies, especially when it comes to national defense and the economy (leading me to once again wonder if they should pass out IQ tests at voter registrations). People may still like his charming scripts, but deeds eventually overcome words. Obama knew that the world was watching so he did throw mainstream America a few bones.

For one thing, Obama shot a hole in the radical denial of the Holocaust saying,

Denying that fact [the Holocaust] is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction – or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews – is deeply wrong.

The president also tried to be clear about 9/11:

I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And, unlike Jimmy Carter, Obama refused to attack Israel as a terrorist state, instead acknowledging their relationship with America.

America’s strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.

But as always is the case with Obama, his world view will not allow him to make the most obvious of observations concerning America and it's citizens. For most of us the bond with Israel is based less on cultural and historical ties than the fact that Israel is a democratic nation that shares of core value of freedom.

Obama also took some subtle shots at Israel. For example, when addressing Palestinian violence (aka, terrorism) he conjured a disconnected analogy.

“Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America’s founding."

In Barack Obama's world, Israel is the cruel slave owner and the terrorists who bomb their pizza parlors and intentionally fire missiles into their schools are simply the oppressed acting up and acting out. In fact, when Obama gave examples of antisemitism around the world he curiously avoided the primary group that regularly promises the elimination of all Jews: radical Islamic terrorist.

In an even more troubling passage, Obama claimed “for more than sixty years they [Palestinians] have endured the pain of dislocation.” But wait, Israel did not gain control of the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights until 1967, after the six-day war. Where did the extra 20 years come from? By claiming the the pain of dislocation began 60 years ago, Obama is pointing back to 1948 and the establishment of a Jewish state -- he is no longer talking about the Palestinian dilemma, but playing into the argument that the Arab world has claim to all of Israel.

And, of course, Obama's "history lesson" also fails to mention Jordan and Egypt's role in the Palestinian camps nor does he comment even in passing that more Jews were dislocated from Arab states in 1948 than Arabs from Israel.

It appears as though Barack Obama tried to play the middle road in this speech, taking shots at the most ludicrous accusations sputtered from our enemies. But there were also some disturbing revelations to the underpinnings of the administration's Middle East policy. I'm not so sure how well this will play with people who actually understood what was revealed and know the threats that haunt the world.

Take The Qur'an Challenge

I have to admit that my knowledge of "the religion of peace is secondary," so I rely on the scholarship of others . . . and I also admit that given my limited intellect I am far more likely to learn when I'm amused.

I found this at one of my favorite sites, Woman Honor Thyself, where Angel is always ready to provide tools for learning.

So, are you ready to take The Qur'an challenge?