Socialism Has Arrived In America Via Barack Obama
OK, moderate Democrats, will you finally admit that Obama is a socialist? You claimed that Republicans are simply paranoid fear-mongers who see a government power grab every time a tax is ticked. You said Obama wasn't a radical with his Che posters and off-script yapping about redistribution. You claimed that the Chosen One couldn't be a commie cause he's so dang cute. Well, he's not cute anymore.
- The federal government (Obama) fired the CEO of a public company. Unprecedented in American history.
- The federal government (Obama) has given an American company 30 days to sell themselves to a foreign firm or else . . . Unprecedented in American history.
- ACORN (a group responsible for some voter fraud that is unprecedented in American history) has been tasked by the federal government (Obama) to assist with the official U.S. Census, thus employing a politically partisan and corrupt arm of the current administration to assist with the formerly neutral but critical job of counting people to allocate funds and representation.
There has always been a tingly fear among conservatives and moderates that if the liberals ever gained absolute control they would begin pull us all into their nanny-state wet dreams.
Obama, Reid and Pelosi now have absolute control.
We are no longer wondering and the tingly fear has become a bitter reality. The liberal, controlling arm of the Democratic party is not "progressive," they are socialists . . . and they have brought it to America by stepping over previously self-imposed restrictions on Federal power in a way unprecedented in American history
7 comments :
Well, Khaki, what do we DO about it? I am ready to stop talking and start DOING something about it. Yet, I do not know what to DO. Maybe that is part of the problem. Those of us who have seen through these lies from the beginning did not know or just plain would not DO anything about it. I just know that we need to DO something before it is too late.
I worry that the liberals WANT socialism, so I don't think they would have a problem using the word now. The only problem occurred while they were trying to get Obama elected.
Regarding the image: shouldn't the BLUE person be taking money away from the RED person?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the former secretary of the treasury do the same thing to AIG's CEO in their first round to stimulus payments? So how is the Federal government getting rid of the head of a company a new thing for the "liberals" when it has already occurred under a Republican administration? How soon we forget.
M.A., you are right! The liberals WANT socialism. It is a power play. Nothing more, nothing less. I think that they are not using the word yet because they are still trying to fool the American people. It appears that the goverment is doing a good job on the majority of Americans...or it is that the majority of Americans just don't care.
I agree with M.A. These people want socialism. This has been a long climb for them and now they made it to the mountaintop. They aren't about to let this opportunity slip away. We're headed down the road to socialism and my only surprise has been how fast they have moved to do it.
Tell me, did you all go to the poor house under Clinton? Socialism, smocialism, it's all so ridiculous...
Sue, Clinton and Obama are not the same. In fact, no president in history has ever done what Barack Obama has done. Close your eyes, but the truth is there for anyone to view.
H.C., the AIG dealing fell under the legal authority granted in the Federal Reserve Act.
Post a Comment